RadarOpus vs Homoeoclinics
RadarOpus is the professional's library, built and priced like one — Synthesis on the desktop, decades of lineage, sold through distributors. Homoeoclinics sells something else: the clinic, monthly, with a rich set of classical repertories inside. One concession up front makes the rest of this page easier to trust: Synthesis is not in our product, and if Synthesis is what you want, RadarOpus is where it lives.
We make Homoeoclinics. Every claim about RadarOpus below carries a public source and the date we read it; where a figure could not be verified, the cell says so rather than guessing.
The facts, side by side
| RadarOpus | Homoeoclinics | |
|---|---|---|
| Price in India | ₹33,898 onwards, one-time Techjockey, 31 Aug 2026. Higher package tiers circulate on reseller pages without dates — we could not verify them, so they are not printed here; ask the distributor | Solo ₹999/month, everything included; quarterly −12%, yearly −25%; 50% off the first three months; excl. taxes homoeoclinics.com, 31 Aug 2026 |
| What it is | A repertory suite around Synthesis, in the field since 1982 by its own description; buy or rent options exist radaropus.com/buy-or-rent, Techjockey, 31 Aug 2026 | A clinic platform — records, case notes, prescriptions, appointments, online consultations, reminders, patient app, clinic website — with a rich set of classical repertories searched as one corpus |
| Platform | Windows/macOS desktop Techjockey, 31 Aug 2026 | Web, Android and iOS; repertories and materia medica downloadable for offline use; case notes written offline sync when the network returns |
| How you buy it | Through distributors and resellers in India; marketplace listing plus reseller pages, some marked "Email for Discounts!" an Indian reseller's pricing page, 31 Aug 2026 | Direct online signup; the price list is public and the same for everyone homoeoclinics.com/#pricing |
| Add-ons | Additional book packages are paid add-ons; one Indian reviewer's published request: "Price of Add-on packages should be less" Techjockey review, read 31 Aug 2026 | Nothing sold separately — the full repertory corpus, materia medica, philosophy corpus and every clinic feature are in the one subscription |
A note on time zones
One of RadarOpus's longer published reviews — from a two-year user, rated 2.5/5 — is a support-hours complaint: "the support from Europe can't answer until middle of the night … support from North America is never available" (Techjockey reviews, read 31 August 2026). That reviewer is Western; the relevance to an Indian buyer is structural rather than damning: RadarOpus is a European product supported from European hours, and Homoeoclinics is built and run in India. We make no promises about our support beyond that fact — judge us on it once you have something to judge.
The add-on question, and what it costs to answer it
The most common published criticism of this category is not the software — it is the configuration. One RadarOpus customer’s review asks simply that the “price of Add-on packages should be less”, and the pattern repeats across the desktop suites: an advertised entry price for a base edition, with the books a given practitioner actually works from sold as packs on top. Complete Dynamics’ Indian seller, to take a transparent example, lists add-ons at ₹4,199 to ₹28,199 each.
Before comparing any two prices in this market, price the configuration you would genuinely use rather than the one on the banner — our price survey does that arithmetic in the open, including the horizons where a one-time licence wins.
Here, there are no packs. The classical books, the materia medica, the relationships between remedies and your own uploaded combination list (how that works) are all in one plan. RadarOpus has a bigger library than ours, and that is the honest trade-off. But the price we quote is the price of everything we have.
When RadarOpus is the better choice
If your work runs on Synthesis — you cite it, you teach from it, your repertorisation style is built around its structure and its additions — then RadarOpus is not replaceable by us, and this page will not pretend otherwise. The same holds for a researcher or serious student of the repertory literature who wants the deepest professionally-maintained corpus available: that is what RadarOpus has spent four decades being. A one-time licence used for many years also amortises below any subscription, ours included.
When Homoeoclinics is
We sell the clinic. The case record that answers "what did I give last time, and at what potency"; the follow-up scheduled the day you prescribe and chased when it lapses; the patient booking and receiving reminders on their own phone; the prescription PDF on your letterhead; your clinic's website hosted for you. The repertories we carry — Kent, Knerr, Gentry, Boger–Boenninghausen, the Therapeutic Pocket Book, Boericke, Boger's General Analysis and Clarke's Clinical Repertory — are classical texts searched as one corpus from inside the case note, and what they return is clinical reference for you to verify before prescribing: a list, never a decision, never a confidence score. Case notes are read by our own software on our own servers, never sent to a third-party AI service.
₹33,898 buys a serious library. ₹999 a month runs a practice. They are different purchases, and plenty of practitioners will sensibly own both kinds of tool.
Five checks that settle it faster than any table
Take your hardest recent case — one you have already prescribed for and followed up, so you know the answer — and run it through both products:
- Enter it twice, ten minutes apart. Did the top of the list move?
- Pick the strangest suggestion and ask which book and page it came from. Then open the book.
- Remove a rubric you disagree with and see whether the software lets you, and whether the ranking honestly changes.
- Ask in writing where the case text goes and how long it is kept.
- Ask what happens the day a usage allowance runs out in the middle of OPD.
We would rather lose to a product that passes all five than win against one that does not. The reasoning behind each check, with its sources, is in why we don’t put an AI in the prescribing seat.